![]() Meanwhile Duo Mobile has had regular updates, including the most recent one in March 2020.ĭuo’s proactive approach to security is evident because it has yet to be exploited. On Android, Google Authenticator had its first update in April 2020 after more than two years without one. Not only is Duo newer than Authenticator, but it’s also been updated more frequently as well. Updates address new security needs, fix bugs, and add features customers may be requesting. In a world where technology is always advancing and hackers are quick to catch up, updates are imperative to increasing security. The Duo Platform Edition provides analytics to help you monitor the security of your users’ devices and flags out-of-date software they may be running. ![]() It also provides a level of endpoint protection not offered by Google Authenticator. The number of integrations Cisco Duo has with a variety of vendors makes it a great option for businesses looking for additional login security for their cloud or on-premises applications. When it comes to enterprise-grade MFA, Cisco Duo performs better than Google Authenticator in a couple of ways.įirst, it integrates with more applications, a small subset of which include other Cisco applications (such as Umbrella and An圜onnect), to provide comprehensive security from multiple angles. However, Cisco Duo has more value than Google Authenticator, which we’ll point out in the following sections. Opting for free Google Authenticator is better than no form of multi-factor authentication. While cybersecurity is worth investing in, if you are on a budget, Cisco Duo’s cost may be a barrier. If you decide to upgrade to a paid edition at the end of the trial, you’ll pay between $3 and $9 per user per month depending on which tier you choose. The paid versions offer protection in a variety of areas, including user trust, device trust, adaptive authentication, policy enforcement, secure application access, single sign-on, and support.ĭuo Security does offer a free 30-day trial, which gives you a taste of more of its features. It’s the simplest package and doesn’t provide anything besides Duo Push for iOS and Android, options for the second form of authentication, and unlimited integration. The free version of Duo is not only limited by user count, but also by its capabilities. ![]() Google Authenticator is free, and Cisco Duo is only free for up to 10 users. The first difference many prospective users will notice between Cisco Duo and Google Authenticator is the cost. However, Google Authenticator still has an edge over Duo when it comes to cost. If you’re looking for the more secure option for your business, you’ll find Duo Security is better suited to your needs. Some of the differences we think are worth highlighting are: In our experience, we’ve found Cisco Duo to have more security features, but Google Authenticator is still a good option for users looking for a basic MFA platform. While we are a Cisco partner, at The KR Group, our employees have used both Cisco Duo Security and Google Authenticator. When it comes to multi-factor authentication, there are many applications to choose from. (If you want to learn more about multi-factor authentication, check out our article “ 3 Ways Cisco Duo Multi-factor Authentication Benefits Remote Users.”) In addition to what you know (your password), you’ll have to have a piece of information (typically a one-time passcode). ![]() Multi-factor authentication (MFA) increases your security by requiring a second form of verification. Requiring your users to use a multi-factor authenticator is one way to increase your company’s security posture.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |